Review





Similar Products

preadipocytes  (ATCC)
99
ATCC preadipocytes
A: UMAP based on transcriptomic data from primary human <t>preadipocytes</t> differentiated for seven days on a fibronectin-coated flow cell. The colors correspond to different clusters based on transcriptomic analysis. B: Transcriptomic UMAP colored by the lipid accumulation score, defined as the ratio between the BODIPY stain and the nuclear stain in each CCE. The insets show examples of cells that are very close in gene expression space but differ in their lipid content. C: violin plots depicting the distribution of lipid accumulation scores (y axis) across the transcriptomic clusters (x axis). D: actual (x axis) vs predicted (y axis) lipid accumulation scores from the elastic net model. The plot is for the held-out test set (20% of the total data). E: Euler diagram showing the overlap between top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters (blue) and model-selected predictors of lipid accumulation (pink). F: average Log2 fold-change between clusters (x axis) vs absolute model coefficient (y axis) for the genes selected by the model. The red color indicates genes that are among the top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters. G: Gene expression UMAP colored by the top-3 positive predictors identified by the model, showing that the expression values of these genes are uniformly distributed across the UMAP based on global transcriptomic differences. H: UMAP based on transcriptomic data for BV2 mouse microglial cells. The colors correspond to different clusters based on transcriptomic analysis. I: transcriptomic UMAP colored by phagocytic activity as measured by pHrodo™ intensity after four hours. J: UMAP based on DINOv2 features, colored by phagocytic activity showing a greater degree of separation between high vs low phagocytic scores, compared to the transcriptomic UMAP in panel H. K: violin plots depicting the distribution of phagocytic scores (y axis) across the transcriptomic clusters (x axis). L: R 2 performance of elastic net models trained on expression-only features, DINOv2-only features or a combination of the two (x axis). The data refers to the held-out test set (20% of the total data). M: actual (x axis) vs predicted (y axis) phagocytic scores from the elastic net model using the combined expression and DINOv2 features. The plot is for the held-out test set (20% of the total data). N: Euler plot showing the overlap between top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters (blue) and model-selected predictors of phagocytic activity (pink). O: average Log2 fold-change between clusters (x axis) vs absolute models coefficient (y axis) for the genes selected by the expression-only model. The red color indicates genes that are among the top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters. P: ridge plots displaying the expression level (x axis) of Gpnmb and Clec4e across transcriptomic clusters (x axis). These two genes are among the top positive predictors for the gene expression-based model and have clear mechanistic evidence linking them to the phagocytosis process. However, their expression is very similar across all the transcriptomic clusters.
Preadipocytes, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/preadipocytes/product/ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
preadipocytes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
sentieon toolkit  (Sentieon Inc)
86
Sentieon Inc sentieon toolkit
A: UMAP based on transcriptomic data from primary human <t>preadipocytes</t> differentiated for seven days on a fibronectin-coated flow cell. The colors correspond to different clusters based on transcriptomic analysis. B: Transcriptomic UMAP colored by the lipid accumulation score, defined as the ratio between the BODIPY stain and the nuclear stain in each CCE. The insets show examples of cells that are very close in gene expression space but differ in their lipid content. C: violin plots depicting the distribution of lipid accumulation scores (y axis) across the transcriptomic clusters (x axis). D: actual (x axis) vs predicted (y axis) lipid accumulation scores from the elastic net model. The plot is for the held-out test set (20% of the total data). E: Euler diagram showing the overlap between top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters (blue) and model-selected predictors of lipid accumulation (pink). F: average Log2 fold-change between clusters (x axis) vs absolute model coefficient (y axis) for the genes selected by the model. The red color indicates genes that are among the top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters. G: Gene expression UMAP colored by the top-3 positive predictors identified by the model, showing that the expression values of these genes are uniformly distributed across the UMAP based on global transcriptomic differences. H: UMAP based on transcriptomic data for BV2 mouse microglial cells. The colors correspond to different clusters based on transcriptomic analysis. I: transcriptomic UMAP colored by phagocytic activity as measured by pHrodo™ intensity after four hours. J: UMAP based on DINOv2 features, colored by phagocytic activity showing a greater degree of separation between high vs low phagocytic scores, compared to the transcriptomic UMAP in panel H. K: violin plots depicting the distribution of phagocytic scores (y axis) across the transcriptomic clusters (x axis). L: R 2 performance of elastic net models trained on expression-only features, DINOv2-only features or a combination of the two (x axis). The data refers to the held-out test set (20% of the total data). M: actual (x axis) vs predicted (y axis) phagocytic scores from the elastic net model using the combined expression and DINOv2 features. The plot is for the held-out test set (20% of the total data). N: Euler plot showing the overlap between top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters (blue) and model-selected predictors of phagocytic activity (pink). O: average Log2 fold-change between clusters (x axis) vs absolute models coefficient (y axis) for the genes selected by the expression-only model. The red color indicates genes that are among the top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters. P: ridge plots displaying the expression level (x axis) of Gpnmb and Clec4e across transcriptomic clusters (x axis). These two genes are among the top positive predictors for the gene expression-based model and have clear mechanistic evidence linking them to the phagocytosis process. However, their expression is very similar across all the transcriptomic clusters.
Sentieon Toolkit, supplied by Sentieon Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/sentieon toolkit/product/Sentieon Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sentieon toolkit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gender analysis toolkit  (Jhpiego Corporation)
86
Jhpiego Corporation gender analysis toolkit
A: UMAP based on transcriptomic data from primary human <t>preadipocytes</t> differentiated for seven days on a fibronectin-coated flow cell. The colors correspond to different clusters based on transcriptomic analysis. B: Transcriptomic UMAP colored by the lipid accumulation score, defined as the ratio between the BODIPY stain and the nuclear stain in each CCE. The insets show examples of cells that are very close in gene expression space but differ in their lipid content. C: violin plots depicting the distribution of lipid accumulation scores (y axis) across the transcriptomic clusters (x axis). D: actual (x axis) vs predicted (y axis) lipid accumulation scores from the elastic net model. The plot is for the held-out test set (20% of the total data). E: Euler diagram showing the overlap between top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters (blue) and model-selected predictors of lipid accumulation (pink). F: average Log2 fold-change between clusters (x axis) vs absolute model coefficient (y axis) for the genes selected by the model. The red color indicates genes that are among the top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters. G: Gene expression UMAP colored by the top-3 positive predictors identified by the model, showing that the expression values of these genes are uniformly distributed across the UMAP based on global transcriptomic differences. H: UMAP based on transcriptomic data for BV2 mouse microglial cells. The colors correspond to different clusters based on transcriptomic analysis. I: transcriptomic UMAP colored by phagocytic activity as measured by pHrodo™ intensity after four hours. J: UMAP based on DINOv2 features, colored by phagocytic activity showing a greater degree of separation between high vs low phagocytic scores, compared to the transcriptomic UMAP in panel H. K: violin plots depicting the distribution of phagocytic scores (y axis) across the transcriptomic clusters (x axis). L: R 2 performance of elastic net models trained on expression-only features, DINOv2-only features or a combination of the two (x axis). The data refers to the held-out test set (20% of the total data). M: actual (x axis) vs predicted (y axis) phagocytic scores from the elastic net model using the combined expression and DINOv2 features. The plot is for the held-out test set (20% of the total data). N: Euler plot showing the overlap between top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters (blue) and model-selected predictors of phagocytic activity (pink). O: average Log2 fold-change between clusters (x axis) vs absolute models coefficient (y axis) for the genes selected by the expression-only model. The red color indicates genes that are among the top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters. P: ridge plots displaying the expression level (x axis) of Gpnmb and Clec4e across transcriptomic clusters (x axis). These two genes are among the top positive predictors for the gene expression-based model and have clear mechanistic evidence linking them to the phagocytosis process. However, their expression is very similar across all the transcriptomic clusters.
Gender Analysis Toolkit, supplied by Jhpiego Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gender analysis toolkit/product/Jhpiego Corporation
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gender analysis toolkit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
sra toolkit  (Biotechnology Information)
86
Biotechnology Information sra toolkit
A: UMAP based on transcriptomic data from primary human <t>preadipocytes</t> differentiated for seven days on a fibronectin-coated flow cell. The colors correspond to different clusters based on transcriptomic analysis. B: Transcriptomic UMAP colored by the lipid accumulation score, defined as the ratio between the BODIPY stain and the nuclear stain in each CCE. The insets show examples of cells that are very close in gene expression space but differ in their lipid content. C: violin plots depicting the distribution of lipid accumulation scores (y axis) across the transcriptomic clusters (x axis). D: actual (x axis) vs predicted (y axis) lipid accumulation scores from the elastic net model. The plot is for the held-out test set (20% of the total data). E: Euler diagram showing the overlap between top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters (blue) and model-selected predictors of lipid accumulation (pink). F: average Log2 fold-change between clusters (x axis) vs absolute model coefficient (y axis) for the genes selected by the model. The red color indicates genes that are among the top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters. G: Gene expression UMAP colored by the top-3 positive predictors identified by the model, showing that the expression values of these genes are uniformly distributed across the UMAP based on global transcriptomic differences. H: UMAP based on transcriptomic data for BV2 mouse microglial cells. The colors correspond to different clusters based on transcriptomic analysis. I: transcriptomic UMAP colored by phagocytic activity as measured by pHrodo™ intensity after four hours. J: UMAP based on DINOv2 features, colored by phagocytic activity showing a greater degree of separation between high vs low phagocytic scores, compared to the transcriptomic UMAP in panel H. K: violin plots depicting the distribution of phagocytic scores (y axis) across the transcriptomic clusters (x axis). L: R 2 performance of elastic net models trained on expression-only features, DINOv2-only features or a combination of the two (x axis). The data refers to the held-out test set (20% of the total data). M: actual (x axis) vs predicted (y axis) phagocytic scores from the elastic net model using the combined expression and DINOv2 features. The plot is for the held-out test set (20% of the total data). N: Euler plot showing the overlap between top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters (blue) and model-selected predictors of phagocytic activity (pink). O: average Log2 fold-change between clusters (x axis) vs absolute models coefficient (y axis) for the genes selected by the expression-only model. The red color indicates genes that are among the top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters. P: ridge plots displaying the expression level (x axis) of Gpnmb and Clec4e across transcriptomic clusters (x axis). These two genes are among the top positive predictors for the gene expression-based model and have clear mechanistic evidence linking them to the phagocytosis process. However, their expression is very similar across all the transcriptomic clusters.
Sra Toolkit, supplied by Biotechnology Information, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/sra toolkit/product/Biotechnology Information
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sra toolkit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
adipocyte differentiation tool kit  (ATCC)
99
ATCC adipocyte differentiation tool kit
A: UMAP based on transcriptomic data from primary human <t>preadipocytes</t> differentiated for seven days on a fibronectin-coated flow cell. The colors correspond to different clusters based on transcriptomic analysis. B: Transcriptomic UMAP colored by the lipid accumulation score, defined as the ratio between the BODIPY stain and the nuclear stain in each CCE. The insets show examples of cells that are very close in gene expression space but differ in their lipid content. C: violin plots depicting the distribution of lipid accumulation scores (y axis) across the transcriptomic clusters (x axis). D: actual (x axis) vs predicted (y axis) lipid accumulation scores from the elastic net model. The plot is for the held-out test set (20% of the total data). E: Euler diagram showing the overlap between top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters (blue) and model-selected predictors of lipid accumulation (pink). F: average Log2 fold-change between clusters (x axis) vs absolute model coefficient (y axis) for the genes selected by the model. The red color indicates genes that are among the top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters. G: Gene expression UMAP colored by the top-3 positive predictors identified by the model, showing that the expression values of these genes are uniformly distributed across the UMAP based on global transcriptomic differences. H: UMAP based on transcriptomic data for BV2 mouse microglial cells. The colors correspond to different clusters based on transcriptomic analysis. I: transcriptomic UMAP colored by phagocytic activity as measured by pHrodo™ intensity after four hours. J: UMAP based on DINOv2 features, colored by phagocytic activity showing a greater degree of separation between high vs low phagocytic scores, compared to the transcriptomic UMAP in panel H. K: violin plots depicting the distribution of phagocytic scores (y axis) across the transcriptomic clusters (x axis). L: R 2 performance of elastic net models trained on expression-only features, DINOv2-only features or a combination of the two (x axis). The data refers to the held-out test set (20% of the total data). M: actual (x axis) vs predicted (y axis) phagocytic scores from the elastic net model using the combined expression and DINOv2 features. The plot is for the held-out test set (20% of the total data). N: Euler plot showing the overlap between top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters (blue) and model-selected predictors of phagocytic activity (pink). O: average Log2 fold-change between clusters (x axis) vs absolute models coefficient (y axis) for the genes selected by the expression-only model. The red color indicates genes that are among the top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters. P: ridge plots displaying the expression level (x axis) of Gpnmb and Clec4e across transcriptomic clusters (x axis). These two genes are among the top positive predictors for the gene expression-based model and have clear mechanistic evidence linking them to the phagocytosis process. However, their expression is very similar across all the transcriptomic clusters.
Adipocyte Differentiation Tool Kit, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/adipocyte differentiation tool kit/product/ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
adipocyte differentiation tool kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
cooksey developmental stages praat acoustic analysis software opensmile audio feature extraction toolkit mdvp multi dimensional voice program  (Kay Elemetrics Corp)
86
Kay Elemetrics Corp cooksey developmental stages praat acoustic analysis software opensmile audio feature extraction toolkit mdvp multi dimensional voice program
A: UMAP based on transcriptomic data from primary human <t>preadipocytes</t> differentiated for seven days on a fibronectin-coated flow cell. The colors correspond to different clusters based on transcriptomic analysis. B: Transcriptomic UMAP colored by the lipid accumulation score, defined as the ratio between the BODIPY stain and the nuclear stain in each CCE. The insets show examples of cells that are very close in gene expression space but differ in their lipid content. C: violin plots depicting the distribution of lipid accumulation scores (y axis) across the transcriptomic clusters (x axis). D: actual (x axis) vs predicted (y axis) lipid accumulation scores from the elastic net model. The plot is for the held-out test set (20% of the total data). E: Euler diagram showing the overlap between top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters (blue) and model-selected predictors of lipid accumulation (pink). F: average Log2 fold-change between clusters (x axis) vs absolute model coefficient (y axis) for the genes selected by the model. The red color indicates genes that are among the top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters. G: Gene expression UMAP colored by the top-3 positive predictors identified by the model, showing that the expression values of these genes are uniformly distributed across the UMAP based on global transcriptomic differences. H: UMAP based on transcriptomic data for BV2 mouse microglial cells. The colors correspond to different clusters based on transcriptomic analysis. I: transcriptomic UMAP colored by phagocytic activity as measured by pHrodo™ intensity after four hours. J: UMAP based on DINOv2 features, colored by phagocytic activity showing a greater degree of separation between high vs low phagocytic scores, compared to the transcriptomic UMAP in panel H. K: violin plots depicting the distribution of phagocytic scores (y axis) across the transcriptomic clusters (x axis). L: R 2 performance of elastic net models trained on expression-only features, DINOv2-only features or a combination of the two (x axis). The data refers to the held-out test set (20% of the total data). M: actual (x axis) vs predicted (y axis) phagocytic scores from the elastic net model using the combined expression and DINOv2 features. The plot is for the held-out test set (20% of the total data). N: Euler plot showing the overlap between top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters (blue) and model-selected predictors of phagocytic activity (pink). O: average Log2 fold-change between clusters (x axis) vs absolute models coefficient (y axis) for the genes selected by the expression-only model. The red color indicates genes that are among the top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters. P: ridge plots displaying the expression level (x axis) of Gpnmb and Clec4e across transcriptomic clusters (x axis). These two genes are among the top positive predictors for the gene expression-based model and have clear mechanistic evidence linking them to the phagocytosis process. However, their expression is very similar across all the transcriptomic clusters.
Cooksey Developmental Stages Praat Acoustic Analysis Software Opensmile Audio Feature Extraction Toolkit Mdvp Multi Dimensional Voice Program, supplied by Kay Elemetrics Corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cooksey developmental stages praat acoustic analysis software opensmile audio feature extraction toolkit mdvp multi dimensional voice program/product/Kay Elemetrics Corp
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cooksey developmental stages praat acoustic analysis software opensmile audio feature extraction toolkit mdvp multi dimensional voice program - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
web toolkit  (Human Protein Atlas)
86
Human Protein Atlas web toolkit
A: UMAP based on transcriptomic data from primary human <t>preadipocytes</t> differentiated for seven days on a fibronectin-coated flow cell. The colors correspond to different clusters based on transcriptomic analysis. B: Transcriptomic UMAP colored by the lipid accumulation score, defined as the ratio between the BODIPY stain and the nuclear stain in each CCE. The insets show examples of cells that are very close in gene expression space but differ in their lipid content. C: violin plots depicting the distribution of lipid accumulation scores (y axis) across the transcriptomic clusters (x axis). D: actual (x axis) vs predicted (y axis) lipid accumulation scores from the elastic net model. The plot is for the held-out test set (20% of the total data). E: Euler diagram showing the overlap between top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters (blue) and model-selected predictors of lipid accumulation (pink). F: average Log2 fold-change between clusters (x axis) vs absolute model coefficient (y axis) for the genes selected by the model. The red color indicates genes that are among the top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters. G: Gene expression UMAP colored by the top-3 positive predictors identified by the model, showing that the expression values of these genes are uniformly distributed across the UMAP based on global transcriptomic differences. H: UMAP based on transcriptomic data for BV2 mouse microglial cells. The colors correspond to different clusters based on transcriptomic analysis. I: transcriptomic UMAP colored by phagocytic activity as measured by pHrodo™ intensity after four hours. J: UMAP based on DINOv2 features, colored by phagocytic activity showing a greater degree of separation between high vs low phagocytic scores, compared to the transcriptomic UMAP in panel H. K: violin plots depicting the distribution of phagocytic scores (y axis) across the transcriptomic clusters (x axis). L: R 2 performance of elastic net models trained on expression-only features, DINOv2-only features or a combination of the two (x axis). The data refers to the held-out test set (20% of the total data). M: actual (x axis) vs predicted (y axis) phagocytic scores from the elastic net model using the combined expression and DINOv2 features. The plot is for the held-out test set (20% of the total data). N: Euler plot showing the overlap between top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters (blue) and model-selected predictors of phagocytic activity (pink). O: average Log2 fold-change between clusters (x axis) vs absolute models coefficient (y axis) for the genes selected by the expression-only model. The red color indicates genes that are among the top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters. P: ridge plots displaying the expression level (x axis) of Gpnmb and Clec4e across transcriptomic clusters (x axis). These two genes are among the top positive predictors for the gene expression-based model and have clear mechanistic evidence linking them to the phagocytosis process. However, their expression is very similar across all the transcriptomic clusters.
Web Toolkit, supplied by Human Protein Atlas, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/web toolkit/product/Human Protein Atlas
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
web toolkit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
cell ranger toolkit  (10X Genomics)
86
10X Genomics cell ranger toolkit
A: UMAP based on transcriptomic data from primary human <t>preadipocytes</t> differentiated for seven days on a fibronectin-coated flow cell. The colors correspond to different clusters based on transcriptomic analysis. B: Transcriptomic UMAP colored by the lipid accumulation score, defined as the ratio between the BODIPY stain and the nuclear stain in each CCE. The insets show examples of cells that are very close in gene expression space but differ in their lipid content. C: violin plots depicting the distribution of lipid accumulation scores (y axis) across the transcriptomic clusters (x axis). D: actual (x axis) vs predicted (y axis) lipid accumulation scores from the elastic net model. The plot is for the held-out test set (20% of the total data). E: Euler diagram showing the overlap between top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters (blue) and model-selected predictors of lipid accumulation (pink). F: average Log2 fold-change between clusters (x axis) vs absolute model coefficient (y axis) for the genes selected by the model. The red color indicates genes that are among the top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters. G: Gene expression UMAP colored by the top-3 positive predictors identified by the model, showing that the expression values of these genes are uniformly distributed across the UMAP based on global transcriptomic differences. H: UMAP based on transcriptomic data for BV2 mouse microglial cells. The colors correspond to different clusters based on transcriptomic analysis. I: transcriptomic UMAP colored by phagocytic activity as measured by pHrodo™ intensity after four hours. J: UMAP based on DINOv2 features, colored by phagocytic activity showing a greater degree of separation between high vs low phagocytic scores, compared to the transcriptomic UMAP in panel H. K: violin plots depicting the distribution of phagocytic scores (y axis) across the transcriptomic clusters (x axis). L: R 2 performance of elastic net models trained on expression-only features, DINOv2-only features or a combination of the two (x axis). The data refers to the held-out test set (20% of the total data). M: actual (x axis) vs predicted (y axis) phagocytic scores from the elastic net model using the combined expression and DINOv2 features. The plot is for the held-out test set (20% of the total data). N: Euler plot showing the overlap between top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters (blue) and model-selected predictors of phagocytic activity (pink). O: average Log2 fold-change between clusters (x axis) vs absolute models coefficient (y axis) for the genes selected by the expression-only model. The red color indicates genes that are among the top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters. P: ridge plots displaying the expression level (x axis) of Gpnmb and Clec4e across transcriptomic clusters (x axis). These two genes are among the top positive predictors for the gene expression-based model and have clear mechanistic evidence linking them to the phagocytosis process. However, their expression is very similar across all the transcriptomic clusters.
Cell Ranger Toolkit, supplied by 10X Genomics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cell ranger toolkit/product/10X Genomics
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cell ranger toolkit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


A: UMAP based on transcriptomic data from primary human preadipocytes differentiated for seven days on a fibronectin-coated flow cell. The colors correspond to different clusters based on transcriptomic analysis. B: Transcriptomic UMAP colored by the lipid accumulation score, defined as the ratio between the BODIPY stain and the nuclear stain in each CCE. The insets show examples of cells that are very close in gene expression space but differ in their lipid content. C: violin plots depicting the distribution of lipid accumulation scores (y axis) across the transcriptomic clusters (x axis). D: actual (x axis) vs predicted (y axis) lipid accumulation scores from the elastic net model. The plot is for the held-out test set (20% of the total data). E: Euler diagram showing the overlap between top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters (blue) and model-selected predictors of lipid accumulation (pink). F: average Log2 fold-change between clusters (x axis) vs absolute model coefficient (y axis) for the genes selected by the model. The red color indicates genes that are among the top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters. G: Gene expression UMAP colored by the top-3 positive predictors identified by the model, showing that the expression values of these genes are uniformly distributed across the UMAP based on global transcriptomic differences. H: UMAP based on transcriptomic data for BV2 mouse microglial cells. The colors correspond to different clusters based on transcriptomic analysis. I: transcriptomic UMAP colored by phagocytic activity as measured by pHrodo™ intensity after four hours. J: UMAP based on DINOv2 features, colored by phagocytic activity showing a greater degree of separation between high vs low phagocytic scores, compared to the transcriptomic UMAP in panel H. K: violin plots depicting the distribution of phagocytic scores (y axis) across the transcriptomic clusters (x axis). L: R 2 performance of elastic net models trained on expression-only features, DINOv2-only features or a combination of the two (x axis). The data refers to the held-out test set (20% of the total data). M: actual (x axis) vs predicted (y axis) phagocytic scores from the elastic net model using the combined expression and DINOv2 features. The plot is for the held-out test set (20% of the total data). N: Euler plot showing the overlap between top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters (blue) and model-selected predictors of phagocytic activity (pink). O: average Log2 fold-change between clusters (x axis) vs absolute models coefficient (y axis) for the genes selected by the expression-only model. The red color indicates genes that are among the top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters. P: ridge plots displaying the expression level (x axis) of Gpnmb and Clec4e across transcriptomic clusters (x axis). These two genes are among the top positive predictors for the gene expression-based model and have clear mechanistic evidence linking them to the phagocytosis process. However, their expression is very similar across all the transcriptomic clusters.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Scalable longitudinal imaging and transcriptomics of cells in dynamic enclosures

doi: 10.64898/2026.05.05.723030

Figure Lengend Snippet: A: UMAP based on transcriptomic data from primary human preadipocytes differentiated for seven days on a fibronectin-coated flow cell. The colors correspond to different clusters based on transcriptomic analysis. B: Transcriptomic UMAP colored by the lipid accumulation score, defined as the ratio between the BODIPY stain and the nuclear stain in each CCE. The insets show examples of cells that are very close in gene expression space but differ in their lipid content. C: violin plots depicting the distribution of lipid accumulation scores (y axis) across the transcriptomic clusters (x axis). D: actual (x axis) vs predicted (y axis) lipid accumulation scores from the elastic net model. The plot is for the held-out test set (20% of the total data). E: Euler diagram showing the overlap between top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters (blue) and model-selected predictors of lipid accumulation (pink). F: average Log2 fold-change between clusters (x axis) vs absolute model coefficient (y axis) for the genes selected by the model. The red color indicates genes that are among the top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters. G: Gene expression UMAP colored by the top-3 positive predictors identified by the model, showing that the expression values of these genes are uniformly distributed across the UMAP based on global transcriptomic differences. H: UMAP based on transcriptomic data for BV2 mouse microglial cells. The colors correspond to different clusters based on transcriptomic analysis. I: transcriptomic UMAP colored by phagocytic activity as measured by pHrodo™ intensity after four hours. J: UMAP based on DINOv2 features, colored by phagocytic activity showing a greater degree of separation between high vs low phagocytic scores, compared to the transcriptomic UMAP in panel H. K: violin plots depicting the distribution of phagocytic scores (y axis) across the transcriptomic clusters (x axis). L: R 2 performance of elastic net models trained on expression-only features, DINOv2-only features or a combination of the two (x axis). The data refers to the held-out test set (20% of the total data). M: actual (x axis) vs predicted (y axis) phagocytic scores from the elastic net model using the combined expression and DINOv2 features. The plot is for the held-out test set (20% of the total data). N: Euler plot showing the overlap between top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters (blue) and model-selected predictors of phagocytic activity (pink). O: average Log2 fold-change between clusters (x axis) vs absolute models coefficient (y axis) for the genes selected by the expression-only model. The red color indicates genes that are among the top-20 differentially expressed genes between transcriptomic clusters. P: ridge plots displaying the expression level (x axis) of Gpnmb and Clec4e across transcriptomic clusters (x axis). These two genes are among the top positive predictors for the gene expression-based model and have clear mechanistic evidence linking them to the phagocytosis process. However, their expression is very similar across all the transcriptomic clusters.

Article Snippet: Adipogenesis was induced using Adipocytes Differentiation Toolkit for Adipose Derived MSCs and Preadipocytes (ATCC, # PCS-500-050).

Techniques: Staining, Gene Expression, Expressing, Activity Assay